Tuesday, August 5, 2014

On the UPSC agitation.

There has been a lot of hue and cry recently in the media with regards to the UPSC papers with reference specifically to the aptitude paper being prevalent in English. I am stunned by the arrogance and malevolence that has been on display all over. 

I would like the proponents to answer the following questions before they embark on such step as agitating for the same. Surely, the future bureaucrats should have the ability to see far, shouldn't they? 

1. If the agitation is not about English per se but the dominance of English, why not propose papers in all the 19 languages that are recognised by the Hon. Constitution of India? Why should the insistence be purely on Hindi alone? Don't Bengali, Tamil, Marathi, Assamese and Manipuri students also appear for the UPSC exams?

2. Can the agitators and their supporters provide a formula, whereby it can be practically decided in logistical terms, how many papers of each of the 19 languages should be published or even distributed per centre such that there is no wastage and also it is made to everyone's satisfaction?

3. Once the candidates are selected, can the agitators please suggest how these students will compete in an international world wherein English is the lingua franca ... I know Japanese and German and Chinese speak their own languages on international forums but it would surprise many a people to know they don't shun English exactly. In fact, many of them take special efforts to learn the language as can be seen from the admissions to colleges in Ivy League from these nations. 

4. Should we favour a system wherein people should only be posted to regions they are lingually conversant with? If yes, won't this lead to nepotism? On one end, there is so much hue and cry about parochial attitude of the bureaucrats - will it not make the problem worse? 


5. Do you not think acceding to these demands will embolden them to make similar demands in every sphere of competition? Are you ready to have CAT, AIPMT etc in 19 languages? Will you protest against the USA for not having a Hindi option for GMAT, SAT, GRE?

It is time to think sensibly, not emotionally.   

Friday, December 13, 2013

On Bangladesh

Many people have written to me asking my opinion on the execution of the JI leader. Frankly speaking, I have to study the entire case in detail before I comment on it.

My friends in Bangladesh seem to feel justice has been served but I have 3 questions

1. What was his position in JI in 1971? Was he in a position to order and execute the killings and innocents ?

2. How many people have pointed him out as the man responsible for the murders? If not directly, then is their a paper trail that connects him to the murders?

3. Has he mellowed with age or has he continued in the same vein?

Finally and most importantly why was the judgement changed. That sounds suspicious.

To those who support him, also I have a few questions

1. If you can seek clemency for him and those of his ilk, why do you bemoan the actions of Modi ?

2. Doesn't a nation have a right to punish it's enemies? If he was loyal to Pakistan, then it is Pakistan's hydra-headed policy in display that they use people and throw them to their own fate once their use is completed.

I don't support any kind of extremism and if the actions of his opinion are to he seen, they do make me think whether he deserves any mercy 

Friday, September 14, 2012

The Plight of the Bihari

Following the news has become a nightmare. Every time you hope for some closure for one issue, immediately it gets worsened by another that seems to be waiting for it's own time under the sun.

And plus in my current medical condition, it makes more sense for me to stay away from such 'breaking news' that leaves me with the first clear ambition of breaking the TV. Sadly it costs enough for me, not to indulge is such glamorous acts. So, what do I do? I read Books. Books on History, Geography, Economics and Political Science.

A few days ago, all the news was about the Thackarey clan issuing permits to the residents of Bihar who wanted to come and work in Bombay. I thought maybe I must have read it wrong or maybe what they said was indeed twisted out of context. But no, it was smack in the middle! They had actually asked for permits to be issued.

Now who had done that before???? 

O yes.. Walter Ulbricht did that in 1961 when he divided Germany by constructing the Berlin Wall... Still earlier Adolf Hitler did it in 1933, when he forced Jews and others who were not adherents of Nazi philosophy to wear distinct colour bands. And we can definitely go down the path of History with many such notables.

It would be a joke to add the self-serving, Thackaray clan to this infamous gallery of rogues but still they have been putting up so much against the poor Biharis that it becomes a shock that Bihar is actually a part of India. And Article 19 of the Indian Constitution gives every Bihari a right to stay anywhere and travel anywhere within India. So in short, is the honoured Thackaray clan, challenging the Constitution of India and stating that, hey, look, we are bigger than the Constitution!

Sadly, this seems to be the in-thing nowadays. Every politician worth his salt and involved in Vote Bank Politics is doing the same ... In short, we are again moving to the politics of hate and division that have destroyed this nation, time and again.

I cannot even stop to think how many more divisions are going to be made, just because we cannot understand the moves and implications of these players!

But is this a mess of only India? Are Biharis facing flak only in the nation of birth? No.. actually, their circumstances are much better in India, then in the neighbouring state-nations, thou having a state of their own has not helped them much, thanks to the M-Y (Muslim-Yadav) Vote combination that characterizes Bihari politics.

In Pakistan, there is a clear discrimination against them. They get nothing but downright looks and are called 'Biharis' pejoratively. All over the nation, Biharis maybe in some of the highest positions in the administration, just like neighbouring India, but still there is no group that is hated more than this poor clan of immigrants who migrated to Pakistan under the dreams of a Muslim heartland. The land of the pure it seems had no heart for the people from the poor.

In Karachi, there is an ethnic movement against the Urdu-speaking Bihari Mohajirs, because the Sindhis feel they have not assimilated into the grain of the Sind. That Pakistan left 750,000 Biharis stranded and stateless in Bangladesh is not even to be mentioned. That cannot even be discussed - it's such a shocking reminder of the way our North-West neighbour functions - I mean how can a nation turn it's back on such a huge populace that remained loyal to it's nation amid such a major upheaval!

And in our East... Bangladesh does not even consider them as citizens. They are second-class citizens in a state that does not even consider them citizens but enemy collaborators. The Bengalis has visited on them atrocities that we cannot even think of mentioning. In the defense of Bangladesh, I can at least say the trauma of the wounds is still green, but what excuses do Pakistanis and Indians have to offer?

Do the people realize, that most of the infiltrations happening in the North-East of India are less due to Bengali speaking Bangladeshis and more due to these unfortunate, stateless and discriminated Biharis who infiltrate illegally to India in hopes that maybe our nation, democratic as it stands will be able to do something for them... 

Yes.. India has indeed done a lot for our Bihari brethren, they have a state of their own. Their culture is respected, their Mithali language inshrined and they have freedoms that they can't dream of in the other nations. But sitting on our past laurels is not going to help us - we have to remain alert to fascist tendencies of keeping our nations divided on names of race, religion, region or ethnicity 

It's time to think about it. I am not a Bihari but I can feel the pain and anger in their heart as much as the next one. 

What then should the Bihari do? Should he turn his back to all the 3 immediate nations and create his own nation, thus stabbing the fabric of our oneness? Should the Subcontinent be partitioned once again  just because we have yet to learn the ways to live together..... 

When will we understand, that our cultural ties are not enough.. they have shown their power over a history of 5000 years but if we really need to rise, we have to have one political unity as well... 

It won't take a lot for us to remember that we owe a lot to Bihar... This is where our first universities were born; this is where our first dreams of a United Subcontinent were formed... This was the land ruled by the legendary Angraaj Karna... This is the land of the Nandas, against whom Alexander's soldiers dared not move... This is the land of Chandragupta Maurya and Ashoka the Great... Think about it!




Tuesday, July 26, 2011

The Two-faced Crusaders of Public Morality

The leaking out of the report indicting the Karnataka CM and his coterie in the mining scam and the resultant tamasha in the media has made me wary of the political class has a whole, though it has only confirmed my misgivings about the nature of our political animals and made believing in their words henceforth a case of immense leap in Faith.

Look at the BJP for instance.. .. after almost a year of crying hoarse over the corruption issue, which also included dancing in a 'mujra' sans 'Shoukins' at the tomb of the father-of-the-nation, today when it comes to the point of making a clear statement to the electorate by putting it's own house in order, the venerable leaders of the sham opposition have decided to choose the easy path, the Narsimha Rao path of silence.

Yedurappa will not go, Yedurappa cannot go... Electoral Mathematics will not allow it... and what's more Mr. Gadkari, has also gone all the way, stating that the electoral victory of the BJP in the recent bye-elections is enough proof of the fact that the populace does not think of him in bad light and so the topic is an non-issue! Well... if this be the case, then even the Congress has won the Assembly election in 3 out of 4 states and so the sword of Corruption that hangs over it's head should also be thrown aside.... Sadly for both you and your adversary, that's not the case and that cannot be the case

Corruption has to be rooted out and the dark faces of both the Congress and the BJP need to be scrubbed clean of it or both need to be thrown in the dustbin of history.

And now look at the Civil Society... the harbingers of  change, the all-in-white crusaders against a men-in-black government have suddenly decided to close ranks behind an imaginary wall rather than condemn the government of Karnataka.... where is the famous Anna and his righteous comment on the subject?

It only goes to show that the so called Crusaders need a generous wallop of Surf Excel to wash off their own clean linen that has now been exposed to be as dirty as the other ones......
"Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely" - Mahatma Gandhi

Sunday, May 29, 2011

A Question

My continent has never been a single political entity in all the time it has been around.... Throughout History, it has repeatedly been parcelled into smaller units, each baying for the blood of the other, pillaging it, eying it's own sisters and daughters and raping them as if  they belonged to another.... never have we understood the fact that we were always one beneath all these exterior differences.... from Ashoka, to Akbar and onto Aurangzeb, we did try to build up an empire that would hold onto all of our lands, but the fact is, our own people often proved to be our enemies in this path.... and again today, we are at it.... what more catastrophe does it need to take place before we can shed our differences to see the similarities? How many more partitions have to take place before we see the value of defence in depth? How much more do we need to hate each other and want to destroy each other to understand that this is us, not the other?

I don't know what's it with us..... a White skin is so important to our consciousness that whether knowingly or subconsciously  we always gravitate to them .... the latest example being the inhuman, filthy and foolish display of  sycophancy; the almost disgusting of self in front of American interests..... we don't mind destroying our own people for the sake of those that come in those white wrappers....
Tan Se To Aazaad Hum Ho Gaye Hain, Mann Se Gayee Naa Ghulaami
Pardesi Bhasha Aur Bhess Ko Hi, Dete Hain Ab Tak Salaami
Bhool Kar Apna Rang, Sikhaen Auron Ka Dhang,
Apnepan Ka Chalan Humse Chhutta!
The tribe of Mir Sadique still thrives in this land..... and my continent still is far away from that dream, that vision of one united country, that thrives from Herat to Galle, from Hotan and Kashghar to Tennasarim, from Sistan to Thimpu and Tawang and from Indira Point bordering Aceh to Male, remains but a pipe dream .....

When shall this land be one? Will this land ever be one?

Friday, May 20, 2011

New Steps in a Old Direction

The 'War Against Terror' by the 'Coalition of the Willing' has created a major political and existential mess for the entire world but due to it's unique position as both victim and aggressor, witness and accused, prosecutor and defence, the Subcontinent is in deeper waters than any other region in this comedy of the absurd. Osama is dead, but he has left behind enough headaches for this region and I am sure this region will go through a bloodbath before even a thought of exorcism can be entertained. As long as our political disunity is a truth, peace is a myth.

Though it can be easily proved that the mess has been created and furthered by actors outside the Subcontinent, the actions of some of the political actors of the area such as Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh cannot escape scrutiny. There are very few political divisions that can say with a degree of certainty that they are in no way responsible or touched by this major concern, an example can be made of Bhutan and to some extent Maldives.Anyways, a lot of water has flown down the river since those days, when the ideology and the infrastructure of the philosophy was created, today my major concern is the immediate impact of the situation on the future.

India should fear the impact of the current situation. There are many in the political establishment who are gloating over the current impasse generated in Pakistan, busy in garnering brownies and gathering laughs but they fail to see that the so-called tight spot is an illusion.

I was saddened and shocked to hear the Army General speaking out of turn on the hot pursuit theory. Does the general, respected as he is, know the implications of such a scenario. Warmongers have been painting pictures of 1971 and 1999 but lot has changed since then....  Pakistan has the 4th largest Nuclear Arsenal that is rising consistently, an immense pool of non-state actors that it can use as a proxy, is not dependent on India in any aspect, has a support structure in form of China and is a 'neighbour'; however uncomfortable that may seem. Also, unlike India it has not agreed to 'No First Use' Clause and it can easily override India's No First-Use Clause by using non-state actors; all of them being on their tight leash..... Why would the respected Army General making such a silly statement?

America is not the saviour of Indian interests, nor is it anything more than a faithless lover who will throw off the yoke of your love, the moment it's realpolitik and economic interests dictate otherwise.... currently, there is no reason why America should dump it's bed-partner, Pakistan and make a love covenant with India- in short this bed is going to lie empty for some more time now!

America needs Pakistan in Afghanistan and let's be clear the Great Game that started with the Treaty of Gulistan in 1813 is still on, in fact it's more urgent, more important and more dangerous and for America that one need of being a player in the region will easily override all other aspects, even bankruptcy. Also the fact that Pakistan is the only reliable go-between America has in it's hand, in case China and America have a disagreement is a clincher; remember China holds the reins of more than a Trillion Dollars in Debt plus has a strong moderating influence on North Korea and is also the rising power, the one expected to throw America on the sidelines...... China publicly supporting a beleaguered Pakistan recently is proof of the geopolitical realities of our times.....

If India needs to fear the situation, Pakistan needs to be terrified of it.... It's open history that none of the dictators supported by America have come to any good in the long run; in the short-run, Pakistan will squeeze America by the balls and maybe even make them dance to the monkey tune but make no mistakes, it's not going to last.... Pakistan's importance in the American psyche is not derived from it's own position per se but because of it's power and reach in secondary and more important regions.... it's the gateway to Central Asia, the point of control for the Afghan heartland, a way to the Middle Kingdom and a watchdog to Iran and Russia; these parameters can change in a blink of an eye.

Secondly, it's foolish to ride a Lion, hoping that someday it will be a tame Lion .... the Mullahs, by history have always shown their desire and fascination for temporal power..... they cannot be controlled forever and one day will demand more than Shylock's pound of flesh... any religious fundamentalism has a way of consuming the one who creates the mess .... be wary and be cautious

Thirdly, the unity and integrity of Pakistan itself is under question.... Baluchistan may go the Bangladesh way if things do not improve, the only reason it has survived in the confederation so far is it's regional proximity to Iran on the extreme western border of the Sub-continent and Afghanistan which is itself in severe turmoil. Sind is restive while the NWFP still dreams of a united Pukhtoonkhwa.

Afghanistan, the northern-most boundary of our Continent also has a lot to fear. Americans need to show to it's local populace that the War on Terror is not Vietnam Part II and may insist on the division of the country in two parts with the Northern and the Southern parts divided .... Partition is a favourite weapon of the colonial and the imperialist powers. They have ruled the world on basis of Partitions and it's obvious that they will try it again...... but this would be very deadly and if America goes ahead with this plan, the backlash will be very dangerous and America will find to it's chagrin that the cure is worse than the disease

We are living in very dangerous times, I hope the people who are leading us can handle it well or our Continent will have nothing but tears and blood to show for our errors of omission and commision

Thursday, May 19, 2011

On The Death of a Terrorist

Osama Bin Laden was killed on 2nd May 2011 in Abbotabad, Pakistan....... and the entire world let down a collective sigh of relief..... So what the hell am I doing, writing on a topic that's 17 days stale? Am I out of my mind? Am I gone cuckoo? Well... Maybe, you never know; to be frank, the mass hysteria that followed the assassination, the inglorious and indecent spectacle of jubilation that followed the assassination and almost converted a moment of unbridled victory into a moment of ignominious shame, in a way stopped me in my tracks.

Were these the same people who had been calling themselves the paragons of morality and decency and berating the Other, just a day before the incident? So, to their shameful chagrin, even they were found to have feet of clay... How hard how the morals of the morality crowd fallen!

The only thing that made me feel a little better was a brilliant and humane response from the Vatican and the Lama and the fact that the Muslim world in general, notwithstanding the lunatic fringe, did not make the death of Osama into a matter of Islamic slight...... so somewhere, morality is still alive, and thank them for it!

So what are my views on the Subject?

Osama was a criminal, a terrorist, a man who hijacked a religion, a way of life from it's actuals, changed the rules of the game, and died for it. There is no sympathy for him, not even from a humane angle, he deserved what finally came to him, though I do accept that for being a puny man, he did succeed to keep the most powerful state on Earth in a state of flux for 10 long years - no mean achievement considering that worse dictators like Saddam and Idi Amin failed to do so, even with the entire state machinery behind them.

Still, it was but obvious that when you ride a lion, the lion's gonna get you sometime, the lion in this case being the evil of terrorism ..... I am happy that the man who was responsible for a lot of hate, the man who divided humanity against itself, the man who made a joke of humanity will finally captured..... a great physical victory has been won.

No! The Muslims cannot claim victory, for they failed to save their religion from the evil grasp of the Dajjal; on the contrary he became a hero for a foolish crowd of people who equated his anti-American tirade as a battle-cry against the enemies of Islam! The Muslims had enough chance to stand upto him but at every turn, they failed and in their silence lies their culpability for no law considers ignorance as a mitigating factor for sentence ..... Wake up, Muslims of the world..... your silence is not doing either you or your religion, any help..... Let it be a warning call, lest you be caught napping.....

Read the Quran for yourself - there is a reason why Islam does not have a priestly class, study it, interpret it, and rescue it from the marshes of Abu Jahl and his kin, today dressed up as the faithful ..... Do not forget, the martyrdom of Hussein or Hasan or Ali or Uthman was not at the hands of the so-called infidels, but at the hands of fellow Muslims...... You still have time, don't let it go astray

No! The Americans cannot claim victory, at most they can state that some parity was achieved for the truth remains that it was and is the Americans who created this monster that let loose a blood-bath that will be remembered for years to come..... on the top of it, the disgusting demonstrations that engulfed the cities in US, the rising trend of Islamophobia in the country, only takes away from them what should have been rightly a handsome victory.....

The behaviour of the Students and other personnel in America is in a way reminiscent of the filthy display of arrogance made by the Meccan Confederacy after their victory at the Battle of Uhud...... If this trend remains, this victory would only remain a highmark that would define the high point of their success and would only lead to more debilitating losses in the future..... Wake up Americans.... you still have time

That brings me to the State of Pakistan ..... it's foolishness for the world to talk of Pakistan as a failed state; I would say it's the most successful state on this Earth and no state can even touch base with it's shadow for the brilliance of realpolitik and public relations; it appears as if the Pakistani state is a past master of diplomacy.... nothing and I repeat nothing can break their resolve.....

Osama was obviously in Pakistan by the connivance of the Pakistani State and was finally expedited when the time was ripe, again in the interest of Pakistan.... everything was done to a plan, nothing missed out while America spent billions of dollars in a time of recession for the capture of Osama - money that could have saved many a middle-class American citizens and still, despite it's brazenness, it remains America's first ally on the War of Terror! I am impressed!

As a lasting shot, I would say... the celebrations are premature, Al-Qaeda is a force to reckon with and the announcement of Saif-al-Adil as the new chief of the terrorist outfits shows the depth in the enemy ranks.... A logical response would be to be cautious, and to make a distinction between Al-Qaeda and Islam, not only for the Al-Kaffir but also for the Al-Momin

Maybe then it indeed will be the Death of a Terrorist!


Saturday, April 30, 2011

The Death of an Imposter

So God is dead? Isn't he? Finally? And the world is left an 'orphan'!

Strange are the ways of the world, when even God proves untrue to his promise and dies 10 years before his tenure was supposed to end..... Finally, we discover that even God is a weak astrologer or is it Karma? What exactly went wrong? Wasn't God, supposed to die at the age of 96?.... Oh! he must have forgotten .... so much on his head nowadays!

So Sri Sathya Sai Baba has died, proving his own prediction about his own death, wrong..... Does anyone have a case or should I rest mine....

Ajab Teri Duniya, Ajab Tere Khel
Chhachhoondur Ke Sar Par Chameli Ka Tel!

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Jinhein Naaz Hai Hind Par Woh Kahaan Hai?

This is the True Story of someone ..... a fiesty, ambitious, 25 year old somone who could not suffer sloth and insincerity in work..... This is the story of a nurse who served patients to health but today lies confined to a bed in that same hospital, unable to move, unable to talk, unable to think ...... This is the story of a woman who was raped to her death and still survived to tell her tale, though none can hear it, none can understand it, none can appreciate it..... This is the story of Aruna Shanbaug, a poor lower-middle class nurse who lies comatose on a bed while time flows by, for the past 37 years while her rapist, Sohanlal was freed after spending 7 years in jails! 7 years of Jail for a crime that has cost a woman 37 years and counting!

Happy Woman's Day...... to all of you .... and I am sorry for the delay ... it seems I was unable to write in shame after reading about her yesterday.... To be frank I did not want to spoil your mood that was replete with colours of progress and what women have achieved, with grim stories of what the women have not achieved

Two days back, the case filed by Pinky Virani requesting Aruna to be administered Euthanasia was rejected by the learned Judiciary, though the Learned Judges did agree that Passive Euthanasia could be administered ..... A medical court will decide on the same... My Question is not about the merits and demerits of Euthanasia as a system, that shall be discussed some other time .... My question today is, how long will Rape continue to be the symbol of one's revenge? How long will Rape be the weapon of choice for humiliating and degrading women? How long will Society suffer silently this treatment of Womanhood and remain unaffected by it?

On the 27th of November, 1973, a young girl of 23 who was changing has dress was attacked by Sohanlal, a ward-boy, because he was tired of her berating him and warning him of dire consequences if he continued to be slack at work! Male Ego and Suppressed Sexual Anger could not take it any more and he attacked her in the dark of the night, with a dog chain ...... Since she was menstruating, he sodomized her and left her for dead.... She was not discovered till the next morning when the doctors found her lying on the floor, stripped of her clothes and dignity, cortically blind - the dog chain had asphyxiated her and she had lost all her sense and memory.

The Dean of the Hospital had Sohanlal arrested but he was arrested for 'robbery and attempted murder' .... the fact that she had been raped was not reported by the doctors for fear of stigma and that too anally.... had this been reported, Sohanlal would have received an immediate 10 years for unnatural sex (this law was in place till late 2008 and even consensual anal and oral sex could get you 10 years in prison, if reported) and 7 years for Rape..... But the curse of the 'moral stigma' stopped them in their tracks and this was never reported..... How much more longer are we going to remain silent and allow these acts of depravation to continue?

Sohanlal was found guilty and was sentenced to 7 years of rigorous imprisonment on two counts, with both continuing concurrently. Today Sohanlal is a free man, and it's learned that he is working as a ward-boy, under a new identity, in some other state...which brings us back to Aruna..... 37 years have passed by and she is still alive, surviving on the efforts of the nurses of the KEM Hospital where she worked once and was raped that night!

Clearly Justice has been denied to her.... Clearly, our country has failed her... If the murderers of Jessica Lal could be given life imprisonment for killing her, Aruna has been dying a death every second, every minute, every hour for the last 37 years ..... Why has Justice not been her saviour? Is it because she is not as connected as Sabrina Lall was or is it because we simply don't care......

Democratic India has to reply to this poor soul that could have done much more .... Who is responsible for her plight? And who will stand for her Right? It's easy to denounce the Taliban and the others .... and rightly too, for they are the shame of Humanity but how could we allow something of this sort to happen in our country and still remain silent about it?

The time is ticking..... Justice is Waiting... And Oh, Yes! Before I forget, once again 'Happy Woman's Day'

A beautiful song by Sahir.....
Madad Chaahti Hai Ye Hawwa Ki Beti
Yashodha Ki Hum-Jins, Radha Ki Beti
Mohammed Ki Ummah, Zulaikha Ki Beti
Jinhein Naaz Hai Hind Par Woh Kahaan Hai.....?
(Help is the request of Eve's Daugher
Yashoda's Gender, Radha's Daughter
Mohammed's Mother, Zulaikha's Daughter
Where are they who pride on India?)
 The Capital of India, Delhi is also known as the Rape Capital of India, it's said every 15 minutes a woman is raped in Delhi.... How long are we going to allow it to continue?

It's time to stand up for our women, it's time to make Rape a Capital Offence, it's time to stand against it... But is India listening?

Monday, February 28, 2011

A Letter to Those who Ru(i)n my Country on occasion of the National Budget

I wish we could also have a Budget Session wherein the Hon Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, the Chief Ministers of the various States alongwith the Leaders of the Opposition, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the Speakers of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, the Chief Vigilance Commissioner, the Election Commissioner, All the Different Secretaries of the different Secretariats viz. Cabinet Secy, Home Secy, Finance Secy etc, all the Cabinet Ministers and the Representatives of the Parliament and the Rajya Sabha could gather alongwith all the top industrialists of the country, the media barons, the trustees of all the various Mandirs and Masjids, the heads of all denominations of all religions, all the so-called Civil Liberty Movement people, social workers and inform the Common People in simple terms, the following:

  1. The no. of Scams we will have this year
  2. The Amounts of hundreds or thousands of billion dollars that will be stolen from you
  3. The No. of National Interest Instruments which will be sold for our own needs
  4. And most importantly, how much tax we will pay to fund all of the above
I would really appreciate for a change, this honesty... I am a Common Man, I cannot stop you from doing what you will .... so why keep the farce, tell me and do it... please

As a wise man said, if you cannot stop Rape, at least enjoy it!

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

The Silly Case of Laal Chowk Flag Raising Ceremony

Kashmir is without any doubt an integral part of India and as I have always stated, one of my stated aims and objectives is the re-unification of the entire Indian Subcontinent from Afghanistan to Sri Lanka and from Baluchistan to Burma into one thread..... there is no question of my accepting hence any attempts at secession....

However, the recent Yatra undertaken by the BJP youth wing has completely flummoxed me by its time and tenor.... the wounds of the last intifida have not even died out, but the BJP has decided to engulf the country into one more conflagration.... there are already a thousands of issues that the current government is incapable of handling, on top of it, the main opposition, having abrogated it's position as the watchdog of democracy has decided to take part, and that too, gleefully in the rape of the country's prestige and authority...

I do not seem to really understand what is the problem with the BJP..... is it really as stupid as it tries to show itself? Does it not understand that it's chauvinistic attitude is impacting the nation more than the status quo attitude of the Congress and it's allies? Is it so foolish that it really thinks patriotism is a vocal chord match and all of us are back in ancient Sparta where issues were decided by the virtue of who would shout the loudest, by virtue of who could out-shout the competition?

Does it really think of the irreparable damage it is doing to the nation's fibre by it's insistence on a march that has no sense, no logic, no future thought, except to embarrass the ruling party? Does it even comprehend that by using vocal denunciation of the Congress at every available opportunity, it's actually playing into the hands of the Congress by proving itself as a distant number two? Why can't it pay more attention to the logics of the situation? Why does it have to always use the principle of the Shout as against the principle of the Debate?

Anybody who has lived in India of the 1990's knows of the irreparable damage Murli Manohar Joshi did by his Flag Yatra at Lal Chowk in 1992..... The premise was the same, that we need to prove ourselves by putting up the flag but in the process, MM Joshi managed to do the impossible... he actually got all the extremists to unite and put up a united front, lead to an increased spurt in violence and secessionist activities in the valley which took a decade to abate.... What did we gain from this show of patriotism? Nothing, except deaths of our valiant soldiers who fought and died for the sake of the unity and integrity of our India..... It could have been avoided. But then BJP is not exactly known for subtle diplomacy and statecraft.... and that too from the party, which when in power took Navin Jindal to court for his right to raise the Indian flag...

The BSF itself has clearly stated that there is no need to raise the flag at the Laal Chowk... it's also true that it has been raising the flag in the chowk every year and had stopped it since it has no more political significance.... Secondly, the Chief Minister of Kashmir would definitely be raising the flag in the senate as would all the Govt offices, army services etc... where then is the need for one more?

The BJP has put out an interesting statement that if the flag of Pakistan can be raised in Kashmir, why not the flag of India? I have two counter-questions to this:

Question No. 1: If this is true, what were they doing about it for the 6 years they ruled India? At that time, the NC of Omar Abdullah, which is in power in the state of J&K today, was a part of the NDA, the BJP-led coilition

Question No. 2: Can the BJP, which is used to a language of obfuscation provide documentary proof of when the local administration of J&K, including the office of the Chief Minister was guilty of raising the Pakistani Flag on the Republic Day?

Talking about secessionists raising the flag is stupid because they are secessionists and indeed if they raised the Indian flag, they would cease to be secessionists, of course they should not be tolerated but that does not mean that the state is guilty of the same ... what is important is to ask, if the local government did the same? And if it did, why did the Govt of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, one of the greatest leaders of recent time did not speak of it? Why did the Iron Man, L K Advani who speaks so much on the issue today, remain silent then? Or is it just a case of out-of-power syndrome?

The BJP, using it's policies of division and victim play has already created a rift between Jammu and Kashmir, when will it learn to start behaving like a responsible opposition? Does it really think, this is good for the state and the country in the long run?

An interesting anecdote of the time is that the great leader that MM Joshi is, he was not even aware of the colours of the Indian flag and managed to do the impossible task that even does not happen in Kindergarten - he hosted the flag upside down!

BJP..... we need you to become a responsible opposition - the time is running out.... is the will too?

Friday, January 14, 2011

A Call to Muslims

Salman Taseer was assasinated in Pakistan on January 4, 2011. His crime was that he spoke against the Blasphemy Law as contained in the Pakistani Constitution. His assassin, Malik Mumtaz Qadri assassinated him because he firmly believed that Salman was denigrating the state and humiliating the creed of Islam by such a contrarian stand on an issue that he considered as a matter of faith.

Today as I listen to both the parties on the issue, the charges and counter-charges, the points of discussion and rebuttals, I feel much more disillusioned on this entire issue then I ever was... Have we as humans, divorced ourselves so much from Reason that we even need to see the obvious - that Blasphemy Law is wrong, that the use of the gun to silence an opposition is wrong, that Human Intellect has a right to speak? Hence, Today as I speak on this issue, I shall speak not as an atheist which I am but as a Muslim for that is what I was  .... the reason being simple, Islam needs to free itself primarily from it's own custodians..... and if a Muslim won't speak, albeit an atheist, who will?

Jammat-E-Islami has tried to pretend that there is no issue, that this is an internal matter within the ranks of Islam, an issue for which the punishment has been decided long ago and hence there is no need for discussion, no need for introspection, no need to talk... for them, it's a closed issue!

But is it a closed issue? Is it really a crime to speak of such things as the law of blasphemy? Is it being-anti Islamic if one tries to reason out the tenets of the religion, or to ask questions, however uncomfortable, they may be? Was not ijtehad supposed to be the cornerstone of the Islamic fiqh as opposed to taqlid?

In a civilization and system that prides itself on it's inclusive nature, that first spoke of the Brotherhood of Men, when did the right to speak on behalf of one's brethren become a rallying-cry for the demise of Islam? Are these custodians of Islam doing Islam a duty by being contrarian to the very principles of Islam or are they plotting it's downfall by destroying the very essence of it's existence? Time will tell....

For the time being, the power of the Gun and the Fear inherent from it's barrels has cowed down the majority to silence.... For the time being, the tongues that should speak are tied down by their duties to their near and dear ones.... For the time being, the droning of the machine gun of the extremist has silenced the common man to a state of imprisonment, but the question is how long will it be able to contain the anger within his breast that shall not be silenced even by the explosion of a million atom bombs and it's these voices of silence, which when spoken will shake the edifice of Islam as it stands today ...... Islam has a lot to fear from it's custodians within it's boundaries than from it's enemies that are battling the religion from outside.

Since the time of the Prophet, the doctrine of ijtehad (analytical reasoning) was upheld and promulgated and taqlid (imitation), though accepted in matters of one's personal relations with God, was not given the same emphasis as Ijtehad, till finally the Sunni fiqh went ahead and closed the door to ijtehad in the 10th century. It's no major coincidence that the closing of doors on Ijtehad lead to hardening of stances within the community leading to major repercussions, as the Islamic world lost it's preeminence in worldly matters post the 15th century and turned insular and insecure.

If Islam needs to re-invent itself, it's time for Islam to go back to the early days of it's existence not in terms of the external forms or observances as the orthodox may point out, but in terms of the openness of thought and reason that gave it the vitality to stand back in times of it's adversity.....  What were those parameters? If one needs to know them, one needs to travel back in history and understand why Islam could strike out on it's own, while others failed.....

Islam took roots in the human subconsciousness in the 7th century due to it's simple creed and methods of  connecting the human with the humane and divine. Historical evidences abound that speak for the humaneness that was the cornerstone of the Islamic creed. Equality of Men before God irrespective of colour, creed or station; Right of Women to property and life as opposed to being subjected to feminine infanticide as was the norm in Arabia, No place for Racism in the context of human differences, Absence of a priestly class and many more such reasons that were a revolutionary thought in those days of human endeavour, of course today the world is much more enlightened and better off than those days, but when  we compare a particular ideology to others, we need to look into the times to understand and decipher it ...... The gun was never the choice weapon of Islam even in the days when the existence of Islam was threatened by such powerful enemies as the Meccan Confederacy and even though Islam fought three wars in it's early days of existence, the gun was always secondary to the olive palm... so then today when Islam is in a strong position worldwide with more than a billion adherents and many Islamic nations, what place does the gun have in the normal discourse?

Why can't the champions of Islamic jurisprudence come out and speak out on this issue in an open debate? Why does the gun have to answer for every query that's put to Islam? That was not the way of the Prophet, why is that the way of the follower? What Islam are you following when you put up such conditions as can destroy the spirit of Islam?

Prophet Muhammed allowed the Christians and the Jews to reside peacefully in the nation of Islam and even forgave those hands that fought against him, including the one we know as Hind, the one who mutilated the body of his favourite uncle, Humza and ate his liver raw on the battlefield.... If you declare that you follow the principles as stated by him, what wrong did Salman do to pay with his blood?

An Anti-Blasphemy Law, as a law, goes against the creed of Islam; it was introduced in the Christian countries to prevent one sect speaking against the other, what place does it have in a Islamic society?.... The Quran explicitly states that the Muslims are not allowed to abuse the religion of the other for the reason that it may give unto the other the right and the opportunity to abuse Islam... the action of Malik has ensured that today, even those who would not speak against Islam have spoken.... aren't you, the leaders of Islam, then responsible for this repercussion? By what right do you dare to call yourself, the defenders of the faith them....?

And coming to the main point, what exactly does the law of Blasphemy achieve? How does this law ensure a better place to those living in your society? Can you force people to change their views about your religion by forcing them under threat of life and property or can you try and reach out to them via dialogue? The biggest massacres in Islam were not perpetrated by the foreign element unto the followers of Islam but by those who called themselves Muslims... examples can be made of Yezid and later the Abbasids .... are you the next link in the names of those who mouth Islam and kill it by actions?

So if you want to know who killed Salman, it's not Malik who killed him.... it's you who killed him ... you, the men and women of Islam who dared not speak against those who hijacked our religion for their purpose.... it's you, the men and women of Islam, who suffered silently when Islam was being chained by traitors within .... it's you, the men and women of Islam, who gave away the key of your religion to those who transfigured it and destroyed it beyond recognition .... and it's you, the men and women of Islam... who forced rational men and women out of Islam to wherever they found the right to be themselves  ..... Think why Islam which gave Avicenna to the world has given nothing in an entire millennium and you will know what I talk about.... Silence is a good thing, but not when your life is being threatened with extinction....


A lot has gone down the plains of Mount Arafat since those days and today, the religion that taught of enlightenment is a refugee of it's own thoughts and a prisoner of it's own conscience. Today, in times when the doctrine of Islam is in mortal threat from the world at large, Islam is not doing good by itself by being a ready supporter of it's demise by the ways of it's followers.... It's time for Ijtehad, it's time for a new reasoning.... It's time for a new Jihad... against those who claim to speak for your religion but take it away from your grasp.....

There is a Cat among the Doves, remove it from the doves or there shall be no more doves.... and conversely once there are no doves, there shall be no Cat either.... so act quick.... and remove the Cat before any more innocent doves face death from him....

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Evidences of the Prosecution

MMXI is here .... and we are all watching it with a lot of hopes and expectations, but will anything change... I guess not, for one thing that I have really learned in life is this: the more things change, the more they remain constant ..... and maybe that's the reason why it's stated that those who fail to study their History tend to become History....

I will still continue speaking on Dr. Binayak Sen's curious case .... the last blog was all about why sedition should not be anymore a cause of treason for any person in any of the civilized or should I say, democratized nations of the world... Had it been treason, I would have understood and accepted the conviction - but the very nature of the case makes it difficult for me to suggest any reason why it even was fought - it should have been thrown out of the judicial window, considering the flimsiness of the case....

I took time off to post the second part of the blog because of the many threats and admonitions I received for my last blog.... It was not fear that stopped in my tracks but a feeling that the shriller the voices that condemn, the calmer should be the response....

Prima facie, the entire case is a stack of cards that cannot stand scrutiny even by the worst standards that can be applied .... Here is a guy, a pediatrician of repute from one of the best institutions of India, who has been working selflessly for the downtrodden, going where even the might of the state machinery fails..... a guy who has openly spoken against the Maoists and their tactics, has deplored the methods of warfare and criticized it's leadership.... It's indeed strange that this man has been singled out to be a Maoist....and on grounds that are as shaky as the plains of the Sunderbans after a cyclone.....

If tomorrow, one of my friends asks me to carry a letter to his friend who happens to be in another city, do I by the virtue of having carried a letter become a suspect in the eye of the law? When did an act of genuine humanitarian effort become a barometer of crime by guilt of association? If this be taken as the proof of wrong-doing, I do not know how many of us can avoid falling into this trap at one time or the other?

My critics would point out to the fact that these letters spoke of rebellion and unrest in the country.... that's a plea that's as irrational as it can be.... Going by the attestations of the police manning the jail, there was not a single instance wherein Dr. Binayak met the Maoist leader alone.... they must have been real masters of subterfuge and hypnosis if they were able to carry out such a brilliant piece of planning, all by themselves, in a cell, separated by irons and in presence of officers who kept on looking ... What were the officers discussing while the planning took place - the last Shahrukh Khan movie or the rising price of foodstuffs?

To the best of my knowledge, not a single officer has been accused of dereliction of duty... so it transpires that they were alert and brave soldiers of the motherland - so how could two individuals, who have neither been trained in subterfuge and camouflage carry out such a brilliant operation, not once but many times....

The jailor has also attested that all letters carried the official seal of the prison - in other words was pretty harmless - maybe the good jailor was not trained in the art of cryptology and the Chattisgarh government should make it compulsory on the incumbent and the ones that follow that he should have an advanced knowledge of the subject in the future to save such embarrassments .....

Another major point of contention for the security agencies is that, in one of the letters Dr. Sen was addressed as the Comrade, thus making him a Maoist! I am surprised by the gall of the prosecuting attorney, the stupidity of the defense and the irrationality of the Bench that such an interesting observation was allowed to go unchallenged in the court of Law!

Thank God, the leter did not have such terms as 'Saala' or else, we would have had a more powerful alliance - I mean Dr. Sen and his 'comrade' friend could have been brothers-in-law, we should really thank God, for small mercies..... I am thinking though, going by this particular logic, how many girls have I been married to and how many guys have become my brothers-in-arm.... I  hope none of them is a terrorist or else I am on my way to the prison, thanks to this brilliant piece of art.....

Mahatma Gandhi had once, when asked of the keystone of Indian legal system commented that he preferred a system wherein, even if a thousand guilty could be saved from their just punishments, even one single person should not be punished for the crime he did not commit.

Dr. Binayak Sen may or may not be a Maoist... I am no one to hold a brief for him but I do state that as a concerned citizen of this nation, that the charges framed on him should not seem framed and the evidence brought against him should be found lacking and flimsy.... Neither of the above contentions hold water in an intense cross-examination of the facts.... It's high time Judiciary redeems itself from the clutches of 'guilty by prosecution' syndrome....

Its time we thought deeply about the entire issue. And before I start getting threats again, let me reiterate, I am not a Maoist but I am not a Quisling either ....

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

The Curious Case of Dr. Binayak Sen's conviction on Sedition

One of the things, I really do not appreciate among the intelligentsia, whether in India or abroad, is their propensity to see things only through their rose-tinted glasses and to denounce all contrarian views as fascist or rightist .... What really makes me go mad in the brain and red in the face is the fact that these so-called mandarins of morality are often found to be appeasing to a fault to certain sections of society and critical to a detail to the others.... This is where my path diverges from these mandarins of morality for I believe that there should be the same set of laws for both the parties ... that it's important not only that Caesar and his wife should be above the law but also the entire retinue that associates itself with Caesar!

Still, there are times, when my own stand is found to be very much in sync with these custodians of public morality.... Contradictory? Well, I am quite a bundle of contradictions and so lately on one issue I have found myself closing ranks with the intelligentsia to a very large extent ... the case is that of the life-imprisonment imposed on Dr. Binayak Sen on charges of sedition.

This is indeed a curious case and a curious sentence for a crime under a curious charge... the charge of Sedition! And specially so, in a country like ours which got independence after a long battle wherein many of our national leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak were time again accused and imprisoned on the grounds of Sedition!

The question that I seem to be asking myself regularly these days is a simple one ... does a charge of sedition actually deserve merit in a democratic country and if yes, under what circumstances can the charge be made? And the more basic question is, does the concept of democracy allow for the charge of Sedition .... and finally, was the sentence proportionate to the crime, if any? Being a common man, I can only speak my heart on the last part, the learned judges do have much more material in connection with the case than a lay person like me to discuss the subtleties of the case, however I do think being an aware citizen of India, I can and should have a point of thought on the concept of Sedition....

The Indian constitution is a remarkable piece of art, in that it incorporates the best of all constitutions and provides for the loopholes in each and every constitution on Earth... Indeed, Indian ingenuity has to be appreciated that it can provide such a constitution and then tear it to shreds too ....

Para III of the Preamble to our Constitution underlines the Fundamental Rights of the Citizens of India.... Here I will not be concentrating on all the different rights including those enshrined in Articles 15-18 for in the current discussion, the important part of Part III that needs to be discussed, is enshrined in the Articles 19, 20, 21 and 22 ... in totality, these 4 articles give the citizenry of India the following rights:
  • Freedom of speech and expression (although the phrase, "freedom of press" has not been explicitly defined, freedom of expression for all intent and purpose includes freedom of press.)
  • Freedom to assemble peacefully without arms
  • Freedom to form associations or unions
  • Freedom to move freely throughout the territory of India
  • Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India (This article does have a safeguard for the Tribal Regions, by restricting non-tribals from purchasing or moving into tribal lands. This has been done to protect them from exploitation of any sort. Furthermore, Article 370 restricts citizens from other Indian states and Kashmiri women who marry men from other states from purchasing land or property in Jammu & Kashmir.)
  • Freedom to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
In addition to the above, the constitution also guarantees the citizenry the fundamental right to life and personal liberty, which in turn cites specific provisions in which these rights are applied and can be enforced. They are as follows:
  • Protection with respect to conviction for offences is guaranteed in the right to life and personal liberty. According to Article 20, no one can be awarded punishment which is more than what the law of the land prescribes at that time.
  • Protection of life and personal liberty is also stated under right to life and personal liberty. Article 21 declares that no citizen can be denied his life and liberty except by law. This means that a person's life and personal liberty can only be disputed if that person has committed a crime.
  • Rights of a person arrested under ordinary circumstances is laid down in the right to life and personal liberty. No one can be arrested without being told the grounds for his arrest. If arrested, the person has the right to defend himself by a lawyer of his choice. Also an arrested citizen has to be brought before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours.
None of these rights are absolute; the constitution imposes restrictions on these rights. The government restricts these freedoms in the interest of the independence, sovereignty and integrity of India, and also in the interest of morality and public order, the government can impose restrictions on these rights. However, interestingly the right to life and personal liberty cannot be suspended, even in an emergency.

Let us now try and define Sedition: In simple words, Sedition is the stirring up of people against the government in power and is very much different from the much more intense word, Treason that means levying a war against the state.So if you look at it closely, Sedition is any overt act of a citizen or an organized group that not only criticizes the government of the day but also exhorts that people to start thinking on similar lines.... In the Indian scheme of things, there is a specific law against Sedition ... Sec124A of the IPC.

Sec 124A states, "Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine

This brings us to an interesting point.... .the concept of Sedition as outlined above can be applied in equal measures to anyone in the state, a leader of an opposition party who may have an axe to grind against the ruling party can call on to the people with a stated objective of getting the people to change the government... should that be considered as Sedition? If yes, does that not sit heavily on the rights as enshrined by Para III of the Indian Constitution?

Secondly, if you look at Section 124A, it can be argued that the spirit of the law goes very much against the right to life and liberty as enshrined in Articles 20 and 21 ... to the letter of the law, they may be different but if the person on the basis of a speech or an action is construed to be acting in defiance of a government in power and arrested,  and his fundamental rights abrogated, in the interest of the nation or public mortality, then without a shred of doubt, even his right to life and liberty in endangered, even before the court of law can take due course and find out if the accused in indeed a perpetrator of dissatisfaction or a victim of government mores.... this defeats the very purpose of the founding fathers of the Indian Constitution!

I think a democracy, as defined by Abe Lincoln, is the government of the people, by the people and for the people and so a democracy can have varied viewpoints and there need not be a consensus to the differences within. If we get to a stage where a criticism to the government can constitute a case of sedition, isn't it the end of democracy as we know it? To take things to the conclusive end, this is a draconian act that can be used by the opponents of Democracy to stifle every voice of dissent .... If Sedition is allowed to be a part and parcel of the democratic process, wherein constructive criticism can be put into the garb of Sedition, time if not far when a welfare state would be converted into a police state for lack of space for political dissent and opposition.

I do not advocate that Sedition should be per se removed from the annals of Indian legal code but I do firmly believe that in a democratic setup, the concept of Sedition has outlived it's requirement.... It can only be brought to the light only and only in times of emergency, and even then should be used only for acts that challenge the independence, sovereignty and integrity of the country.... such a law does not have any need in a society that's democratic, mature and has a stomach for digesting dissent.... which is the most notable power in a democratic setup.... else what Sahir wrote for a fascist state can be true of India as well:
Bediyaan Aaj Bhi Pehney Hai Azeezaan-E-Watan
Farq Itna Hai Ki Zanjeer Mein Aawaaz Nahin Hai....
The handcuffs are still bound on the hands of the patriots of my land,
the only difference being, they don't scream their presence like in the past (Transliteration)

Friday, December 24, 2010

Where is the Alternative?

Let me start off today by clearly stating that I am neither a Congressman nor a Comrade nor a revisionist though at different phases of my life, I have been associated with or fraternized with people who belong to any one of the 3 blocs that currently seem to hold in India - the Left, the Right and the Left-of-Centre.......

Yes..... I did vote for the Congress in 2009 but if the truth be told, I voted not for the Congress but for Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi, had it been 2004, I would have still done the same ..... but had it been 1999, I would have voted firmly for Atal Bihari Vajpayee and his team ..... so, if you look closely, I have never voted for the party, but for the personality which is an anachronism, considering that we live in a parliamentary democracy and not a presidential one ... And I am not alone, a large number of people in this great country do the same - others of course vote on religious and castiest considerations....

The reason behind this anachronism is very simple.... there is nothing on paper and manifesto that differentiates the two largest parties in the country! On the face of it, both the Congress and the BJP are complete opposites of each other - the first, a symbol of minority appeasement in the form of secularism, the other reactionary to the principles of secularism.... the first, an unabashed speaker of crony populism, the second, a party close to the moneyed ..... but if you scratch beyond the surface, the one thing that strikes you is this simple fact, that beyond all the external posturing, all the blatant attempts at vote-bank engineering, both the right and the left-of-centre are one and the same.... Whether it's issues of foreign policy, whether it's issues of corporate and social paradigms, both the parties speak in the same language - the words used or phrases coined maybe different but the reality remains that the message is the same ..... Indeed, if the manifestos of the two parties could be exchanged and written on a simple parchment, minus the ideological posturing of Aam Aadmi or Ram Janambhoomi, the chances would be that none would be a bit wiser of which manifesto stands for which party -  so alike are they in thought or deed!

This is a sad point of reference - for the BJP at one time had a chance to be something different - they had a different agenda, they had a different focus, they had a different point of engagement - people would argue that their religious agenda had no place in a secular country like India ... that may be true but a Conservative space was there's for the taking..... this would have helped the country in many ways - the birth of a true Conservative Party would have pushed the dominant Congress to the Centre more strongly or even made a Liberal Party of it ... thus giving ample choices to the populace at large.... The failure of BJP to hold on to that space and it's continuous efforts to define it's position in religious terms led to the great failure of the 1990s. Today, the competition is not between two different strands of thought, but between two different hues of the same strand - it's either hawk or kite .... hard or soft ..... but increasingly the same!

The only party that seems to have a different opinion is the Communist bloc parties but these parties have not stopped living in the heydays of the 1970s. How can a citizen of 2010 vote for parties, that though different, still are averse to change or even to keep in single step with the changing times? The Land reform policies, the Social Security Act may have a large Communist footprint to the text but the fact remains that the Left has failed the nation by not watching it's step and in the process has marginalized it's own existence in the country. So, what could have been a credible force of opposition has failed the right to enter the hallowed portals of the Parliament itself!

The less said about the regional and casteist and communal parties the better ..... the joke of India is that today we have more than 500 parties but not a single party that can be considered as an alternative. Interestingly, while the populace of India has increased and the pressures of governance become more and more crucial, the political space has shrunk and this is not a good sign for the future.....

Man lives on Hope and Hope is all I have with me today.....
Wo Subaah Kabhi To Aayegi ..... Wo Subaah Kabhi To Aayegi

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Bihar Elections - A New Trend or Old wine in a New Bottle?

The Bihar Elections is not a story of the success of Nitish Kumar and the defeat of Laloo Prasad Yadav ... it's not a story of the astonishing growth of a party essentially built on a Hindu backlash to Muslim vote banks (the BJP), in the Muslim hinterlands, it's also not a story of the final dismantling of the great social engineering plank that the Congress once was ...... it's much beyond all of this!

It is a story of a state that was once at the vanguard of India, as we know it - a state that once led India in all possible indices of development and prosperity.... It is the story of a state that gave rise to the first empire of India, the Nandas and then nourished the next two..... This is the story of a state that was once synonymous with power and diplomacy, where Chandragupta taught the power of the sword and Ashoka showed the power of the word; where Arya Chanakya taught statecraft and Gautam Buddha delvered enlightenment .....

It's all of the above 'But' more importantly this is a story of a state that fell from grace as did Adam from Eden and then languished in the doldrums to such an extent that a day did arrive when the state that had burnt many a candles for two millenia and more, was suddenly left in the dark with no candles, no torch, no light.... It's also the story of Man's indomitable fight against circumstances - of the dream that lives on, even when the reality forces one on, on a path different from the dream...... This is the story of Bihar!

Karpoorji Thakur had two illustrious and much-appreciated students - students, any teacher would be proud of ... this is the story of those two students, their contrasting ways and purposes and how a state was destroyed while the two went their separate ways....

But for India and for the rest of the continent, this is also a story that asks one specific question: Can the Governance of the Indian Sub-Continent be ever liberated from the cesspool of personal and communal considerations in which it finds itself mired today? Do not think, for a second, that this is the question of India alone - for it's not! Every incident in this entire-subcontinent even if takes place on the far-flung corners of the same, does in a course of time impact each and every player, sooner or later....

The results are out - on the face of it, it seems development has won the first round and casteist and  communal politics have been shown the door... In the words, of television anchors and reporters, the ones who are the first to see a trend where there are none and also the first to abandon the trend when public or business opinions change, Bihar has made a turnaround..... today, the populace of Bihar has rejected the charisma of Laloo to the pragmatism of Nitish.....

To an extent, it's true that, yes, Nitish has been a benefactor to Bihar.... he has brought about a turnaround that none could have ever expected or believed in ..... where doing business yesterday was a matter of fear, today chambers of business proclaim increment in investment! Where kidnappings was once the order of the day, today womenfolk are seen travelling even about 7 PM! And finally, the roads of Patna do look somewhat like the cheeks of Hema Malini - so what if the cheeks still belong to the Hema of 2010 and not the Hema of 1970 - still it's a vast improvement, at least they do resemble the much-vaunted Libran cheeks and that too for quite a distance in the hinterland.... not even Delhi can boast of such cheeks in the hinterland!

Yes, development has come to Bihar! Finally! At Last! but is this the end of the Caste Politics, has the Vote Bank Politics finally come to an end, has the sub-continent finally moved on? These are more difficult questions and to be frank, it would be too early to sound the bugle on any of these....

The Great success has not come without making concessions to the other side, the decadent dark face of the spectrum .....  as we shall see, the politics of they versus us has not yet been fully dismantled and this is where the concern lies ....

Where Laloo had ruled the crest of power on the MY factor (Muslim-Yadav factor), what Nitish did was to make the same combine redundant by taking two concurrent steps; the first step was to create a bigger block of the Mahadalits ..... the castes, now called MBC (Most Backward Castes), these are the backbone of his current success and have taken the war to the next level.....

From the 50s to the 80s, the battlefield was the SC and the ST, by using the Mandal Commission to it's benefit, Laloo and his counterparts, launched the OBC (Other Backward Caste) Revolution, becoming thus the face of social re-engineering and enjoying years at the helm; what Nitish did in Bihar was to position himself to the lower ends of the spectrum and weld them into a weapon of his choice..... Laloo's alliance partner, Ram Vilas Paswan could have countered him as a leader of the MBC but Nitish, using brilliant choice of men and measures, converted him from a leader of the Dalits to only a leader of the Paswan community, thus taking away from him the leadership of the entire Dalit community, thus marginalizing him in his own den ... It takes a Mayawati to play those kind of smart manoeuvring games (one of the reasons she continues to be a powerful player in neighbouring Uttar Pradesh), but Ram Vilas is no Mayawati ..... hence, what could have been, did not happen....

On the other hand, by consistently refusing Narendra Modi, who's perceived all over India as a butcher of innocent Muslims, a chance to campaign for his allaince, he got 2 things in clear perspective - 
  • he reminded the entire BJP brass, that in matters concerning Bihar, he was the boss and he also ensured that the man on the street also felt and understood this message clearly, and 
  • secondly assured the Muslims that a Gujarat kind of carnage could not be repeated in Bihar, since he was in complete control here ......
Contrary to the expectations from a Chief Minister of the NDA, Nitish actually reached out to the Muslims by effectively allowing the integration of the most backward in the community - the Pasmanda Muslims, thus creating a major rift in the formidable MY Equation.....

These two strokes, masterfully played along religious and casteist lines ensured that the much-famed Laloo hand was in severe disarray.....

Add to it, the fact that Development that was something the secular public (not to be confused with leanings but with the open category) always wanted and were now finally enjoying after more than a decade of hunger.... today Bihar is more connected, more confident, more sure of itself and the janata there feels more empowered then it ever did in the last 20 years ....  it was but obvious that Laloo had a battle on his hand...

The final act in the game was women .... with 50% reservations accorded to the women in local and panchayat polls, with free bicycles being distributed among women so that they could study and by endorsing and ensuring the safety of women on the streets by killing the crime rate, Nitish was able to get the most powerful and most difficult players in the game on his side..... whether it's tokenism or not, we will see later .. but as for now, Nitish had the backward community, the Muslims, the general public, the businessmen and the women on his side- something that got reflected in the elections..... Muslims were voting for BJP candidates not because suddenly there was no love lost between traditional enemies but because they were looking beyond BJP to Nitish.....it was the strings of Nitish which got him the result

Looking backwards, everything seems so easy .. .the challenge is not behind but ahead... as the Spiderman comics and movies, often declare..... 'With Great Powers come Great Responsibilities' .... I would say, with Great Expectations come Greater Disillusionment.... the clock is ticking .... and he is now in the most challenging of times.... till yesterday, he was being judged against the inefficiencies of Laloo.... today, he's being judged against the past successes of Nitish.... the battlelines have been drawn.... one wrong step and things can go downhill.... Public perceptions are fickle, they can never be trusted, as Obama would regretfully attest..... so from this time on, it's a walk on a tightrope.....

If Nitish succeeds this time, it may mean that Caste and Community considerations, can, if not today then tomorrow, be slowly marginalized because a second consecutive success would mean that a new rainbow coalition has emerged and rainbow coalitions can and may change the rules of the games..... till then, the battle is in balance....

All the Best Nitish.... and a beautiful couplet from Iqbal ..may it help
Khud Hi Ko Kar Buland Itna, Ke Har Taqdeer Se Pehle,
Khuda Bandey Se Khud Poonchey, 'Bata, Teri Raza Kya Hai?'

Monday, November 29, 2010

26/11 - A Moment of Truth!

26/11 is a watershed date in the History of Bombay specifically, India generally and the Indian sub-Continent at large; many would be surprised by my assertion of including the entire Sub-continent as an entity that was scarred by an event which was seemingly perpetrated locally on one specific place within the Sub-continent..... but I do believe that this brazen attack on Bombay will go a long way in asserting itself in the relations the many, different nation-states within this single civilization share in the long run

I am not trying to play the Big Brother here; as has often been the accusation against India by it's neighbours in the sub-continent, nor am I trying to dramatize or over-exert the importance of a localized incident to an entire canvas.... that would be entirely unfair and grossly incorrect but the fact remains that the incidents of that day mark for a change in the structured responses of the area and restructuring and re-alignment of the entire world.

There have been many terrorist attacks in India and beyond India before that eventful day.... it's not as if terrorism in South Asia suddenly made a date with history, or a tryst with destiny on that particular day..... to be precise, even when the entire world was supportive of Jihad (from 1979-1990) and unaware of the course future events would take, even before 9/11 had shattered America out of it's Rip Van Winkle-like slumber and forced it to take a stand against it's own creations, even before the world talked of terror and against Islam, India had witnessed the shattering of innocence, the coming of age, the beginning of the war against a return to medieval mores, way back in March 1993.

But in the beginning, this unruly war had a different echo. The blasts of 1993 and the ones that followed it were divisive and often spoke in terms of Hindu-Muslim relations, Hindu-Muslim animosity, Hindu-Muslim incompatibility on the sub-continent; they positioned themselves as the weapons of vengeance and blamed the demolition of the Babri Masjid and the whirlwind riots that followed the demolition in Bombay, Bhagalpur, Godhra etc as the cause for the blasts...... throughout India, every blast from 1993 to 2008 was just another event that furthered the divisive agenda of hardliners, making rapprochement impossible and strengthened the extremists within both the communities. This hard-lining of  positions within communities was exploited successfully by the political parties - the BJP for Hindus and the Samajwaadi Party for the Muslims for growth and power and both these parties and their affiliates grew fat on the blood of the common man. It's true that neither, on prime face value was involved in the blasts, however, each took the resultant paranoia and used it for their own better prospects.....

So what is different about 26/11 that it has to be looked at, from a different angle!

Should it be more important because it was an attack on the nation's economic and financial capital, challenging the economics of the city and creating a feat psychosis in the investment community .... not necessarily, because the first blast on 12/3 was also faced by Bombay, (in fact the BSE, the symbol of India's financial power was one of the premises bombed that day) and it was a more severe and sustained attack on all the symbols of India's financial Strength than 26/11!

Should it be more important since it was a major attack that was sustained continuously for such a long period? Not necessarily .... attacks in Kashmir and the North-East have been continuous and more serious and they have been continuing for a generation or more now ...... and in the heartland of India, the 2008 Jaipur serial Blasts which were followed on consecutive days by the blasts in Ahmedabad and Bangalore were worse in their sustaining impact!

Should it be more important because, it was a direct, open and frontal attack on the concept of India - no, because the December 2001 attacks on the Indian Parliament were the most direct, frontal and open challenge to India's authority and sovereignity

So what was it about the 26/11 that made it different from all the others .... what was it about this attack that made all the difference?

The difference in the 26/11 attacks over the ones that preceded it and the ones that followed it till this time, was the living horror that people of Bombay and India were subjected to, for a period of 72 long hours, continuously .... Every blast till that time had been a matter of quick minutes or as in the case of the Ahmedabad serial bombs, the Jaipur serial bombs or the Mumbai serial train blasts, it was all over in
a few hours.... but this time the horror just went on and on!

Secondly, till this point in time, all the blasts had been targeted at one community or the other, one place or the other, one strata of society or the other, but for the first time on 26/11, the attacks had not been directed at one point itself but was spread out to cause maximal emotional, psychological and physical impact! From the poor migrants who were slaughtered at CST Terminus to the rich, Armani-clad socialites who were trapped in Trident and the Taj to the middle-class who worked in these places or were unfortunate to fall on the radar of the terrorists that fateful night, the event was a dark cataclysm that many have still not been able to move out of..... People who died on that day, did not die on account of their faith, as in the Akshardham attack or the Malegaon Blasts, people who died on that day, died in spite of it!

And the most unfortunate part is that those who did not die, still faced the trauma of having to see this entire drama unfold for the next 72 hours.... 72 helpless hours wherein the entire city that never sleeps was held to ransom, the might of one of the strongest countries on Earth was put to the sword by a bunch of 10 unlettered, illiterate but high on fervour and committed terrorists, and all we could do was to sit before the idiot box and wring our hands in despair and bow our heads in shame!

How could 10 men hold us captive against our wishes for such a long time? How could 10 people make us relive the horror of the moment for such a long period?

The answers are still out there but the mind is still too numb to ask these questions. The trauma is still fresh, the fact that justice has not yet been meted out is still festering in our minds, the collective anger and frustration of the day have been internalized to such an extent that no fair discussion of the event is possible without a recourse to emotional

The only positive from the event was the realization that the bullet of the mercenary had not asked a question of community or religion .... that the Hindu and the Muslim suffered equally.... that the rich and the poor were both susceptible and the only thing that mattered was whether we were are part of the 10 who attacked or the many who defended! And therein was the change made.... the change that made it difficult to impart a name to terrorism as religious or communal.... and that's the reason 26/11 marks a departure from the ones that preceded it and the ones that followed it....

The effect of 26/11 was seen all over the sub-continent.... In Sri Lanka, within 6 months of the incident, the LTTE was destroyed in a ruthless war ... none came to stand for it, none decided to support it.... it was simple, the terrorist word had stuck and stuck mercilessly, no one was in a mood to support any organization that stood for terror, even if it meant ostracizing one's own kith and kin for the same .... Terrorist havens were uprooted in places as diverse as Burma and Bangladesh..... Pakistan had to finally take cognizance of the groundswell in popular opinion and register a case against the perpetrators, though as expected the trail was never as serious as it should have been .....

This could have never happened in 2001, though the attack on Parliament was the attack on India itself..... it happened in Bombay because Bombay, in the minds of people, still maintains a glamour, a position as a city of hope, of dreams and aspirations and what people saw on that day, was a bunch of villains trying to take away the dream... the aspiration! Had it been a clean, surgical attack, it would have been forgotten, relegated to the past but it was a living horror that none would forgive... that none could forgive ... and this is the fire, kindled by tears, blood and sweat that forged the new weapon of unity and belonging that continues to this day

It was 5 AM on November 27, 2008 and I was walking near Flora Fountain, close to Ground Zero, dazed at the battle still being fought, sounds of the war in my mind, sights of broken reporters, shocked citizens, lost policemen and determined army-men around me, anger on my face, tears in my eyes, looking at the sea from where my enemies had arrived to fight against my psyche, my soul..... and my heart said 'NEVER AGAIN'

Two years have passed by, I was still near that place today and my heart said ... NEVER AGAIN..... surprisingly, there was no emotion in my voice, only cold and resolute determination......

Sunday, November 14, 2010

India in UNSC

In the past few days, there has been a lot of discussion in India regarding a permanent seat in the UNSC (United Nations Security Council) .... most of the websites have been abuzz with people pointing out the 'coming of age' of India by a public endorsement of Mr. Barak Obama of India's candidacy to the Permanent Position, on his recent visit to India in November 2010. Some people have taken it as the proof that 'India has finally risen pheonix-like from it's deep slumber', others have questioned the euphoria behind the event and how it would make any difference to the overall picture.... Still others have pointed out, that India was offered permanency in 1955 (55 years ago) and Pt. Nehru had declined the offer, passing it on to a China which, turned out to be belligerent rather than gracious....

So what do I think about it? Actually, a lot .... but before I get down to my thoughts on the subject, a brief understanding of the UNSC is of primary importance....

The UNSC is the executive arm of the UNO and as such, presence in the UN is a matter of great importance to any and every country.... Since the inception of the UNO, the Big 5 (USA, Russia (first at Soviet Union), UK, France and China) have been the permanent members of the UNSC - the most important parameter of their power is the power of 'veto' i.e. the power to reject any proposal that may be counter-productive to their national interest under Article 27 of the United States Charter.

Let's have a look at Article 27, before we go into in-depth analysis of the current scenario:

Article 27 states:
  •  Each member of the Security Council shall have only one vote.
  • Decisions of the Security Council on procedural matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members.
  • Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.
Though the 'power of veto' is not explicitly mentioned herein, it can be observed that the clause makes effective space for the same by declaring that any 'substantive' decisions by the UNSC require "the concurring votes of the permanent members." In simpler terms, it means that any of the permanent members of the UNSC can prevent the adoption, by the Council, of any draft resolutions on matter, that may be termed 'substantive'. Due to this reason, Critics of the 'power of veto' is also referred to the same, as the Principle of Great Power Unanimity.

Pt. Nehru, it has been alleged turned down the offer of being a permanent part of the UNSC in 1955, as we have noted earlier, in favour of China. This seat, however, the detractors, may note, was not an additional 6th seat but had fallen vacant due to questions raised on the authenticity of PRC (People's Republic of China), occupying the seat that was the seat of ROC (Republic of China), prior to the Red Revolution of 1949.

Indeed, Pt, Nehru on issues of realpolitik can be considered to have made a fatal error; however, in the past 55 years, there has not been a single instance wherein India's absence in the pantheon has lead to major impacts on India as a nation - of course, the Kashmir dispute could have been sidelined, but then that would hardly be an hindrance since India has, by and large, despite occasional utterances of US in the past and China recently, managed to keep the issue off the burner. Ethically, though, Pt. Nehru may be deemed to be correct.

In my opinion, a permanent status in the UN, though a matter of great prestige and honour, can not be the standard, by which India's rise can be measured. Not all permanent embers of the UNSC are members of the G5 or the G7 - which includes the most industrialized and developed nations of the world..... If India has arrived, it has to take it's place among the G-3; the high-table to the biggest economies of the world... When Economics rules, politics has to rule as well.... because as Chanakya in India, Sun Tzu in China and Machiavelli in Florence pointed out, a powerful state is one, that has a surplus of Treasury.

Secondly, what is the need for euphoria? Do you think, China would vote in favour or abstain to allow India a place in the Pantheon? India's biggest threat is China and China's biggest threat is India .... why would China allow India to sit on the high table? It has been obvious that since 1970s China has been using our own brother and now mortal enemy, Pakistan as it's advance force - why would China support us on the high table, thus allowing us to kill it with one stroke?

Thirdly, it's important to note that all the five permanent members of the UNSC are among the most powerful nations on Earth - they have repeatedly used te power of veto to safeguard their interests .... what is the guarantee that Article 27 would not be restructured in such a way, so as to not allow the new permanent members, the power of veto? And mind you, without the power of veto, a place at the high table is not a substantial position to be in ..... What's the use of a tiger or a lion, that's in a cage, at the mercy of the raw food thrown in by the jailors?

Also, an important parameter that needs to be understood is that the reforms would take a minimum of 10 years at the least - and we are not the only ones that would stand to benefit by these reforms.... Brazil, Germany and Japan have already been sounded off as other beneficiaries of the reforms.... also there is a talk of having an African nation on the high table and another Arab country ....

It's foolish to think the Big 5 would allow another 7 to whittle away their power of the veto... the most sensible approach would then be to delink the veto from the permanency... and as I have said, that would destroy the very purpose why this is being sought....


Hence, in the current scenario, wherein there is a lot of concerns on the reforms of the UNO, I think we need to wait and see, what would be the right step to take, these steps have to be very cautious but deliberate... WE need to understand and understand well, that India's position depends not on the largesse shown by the Big 5, but on the cooperation and support of the other major claimants - Brazil, Germany, Japan, South Africa and the one other Arab state that may join in..... for left to the Big 5, it will be nothing but a farce and we definitely do not need another farce.....

As Kavi Pradeep said once:

Duniya Ke Daanv-Pech Se Rakhna Naa Waasta,
Manzil Bahot Hai Door Aur Mushqil Hai Raasta,
Bhatka Na De, Koi Kahin Dhokey Mein Daal Ke......

Saturday, November 6, 2010

On Deepavali

The Brihardayanaka Upanishad so States:

"Lead me from the UnTruth to the Truth.
Lead me from darkness to Light. Lead me from death to immortality"

So beautifully have the 3 principles of life been propounded .... Truth (Satya), Light (Shiv) Immortality (Beauty) ... Truth is Life, Light is God, Immortality is the only True Beauty.... and all three can be found only in the grasp of God who represents all these 3 principles within himself.

It's the festival of Deepavali in India .... the festival of lights .... the celebration of lights ... a soulful remembrance of the magnificence and munificence of Light..... for as even the Torah states ... He (God) fashioned us in his image in Light ....

More than that, there is Knowledge in Light, there is Innocence in Light, there is Love in Light, there is Purity in Light..... Even if we discount the mythological and religious aspects of the festival, there is a lot to celebrate in this beautiful celebration of Human Existence, this ceaseless continuing journey of Life. Maybe Robert Jordan, understood this principle more than others, hence he made the men of the right Path follow the Light in his brilliant 'World of Time' Series.

But Light is not something that's easily accessible, though it's readily available .... the dazzle of Light can often be stolen by the lustre of mysterious darkness.... It's true that good intentions are important for a man to reach heaven, but it's also true that the path to hell is strewn with not only good but also noble intentions.... and where do we need to remember this more then in our India! A land of dreams, a land of opportunities that rides on the slightest grasp of a silver thread that could break at any moment in time and space.
Savera Tum Samjhe Ho Chamkile  Andhere Ko
Apna Hum-Safar Tumne Banaaya Hai Lutere Ko

Is this apt at any place more then India? Half of the continent is under the influence of either China or America; or shifting towards one of these ... How can we, the sons and daughters of the most illuminated nation on Earth, the most illuminated civilization on Earth, be so foolish that we are ready to cut the throat of a brother at a moment's notice but fail to recognize the enemy that stands on our hearth and home? 

This is because of the dazzle and shine that the crackers of the Far East and the New World that have momentarily and dangerously shifted our gaze away from the light of knowledge.

Deepavali, in it's mythological aspect is about the defeat of evil. I wish it was so easy to understand evil and to move away from it. ... but in a continent that boasts of so many points of effective control, so many nations that make up one nation, from Badakashan to Arakan... how can we undermine the threat to our nation?

Barack Obama visits India today.... the high point of the visit is to sell this country $2B worth of weaponry, which it expects will instill fear and a perception of threat in our sister states. Accordingly, it had, with this point in mind, cleared sales of $2B of sophisticated weaponry to Pakistan..... Isn't this the classic case of the two cats fighting and the monkey making off with the bread? I am a foolish man, but I feel so.... Why are the leaders of both these countries and those of the others, not able to understand the threat emanating from this docile friend?

Burma similarly is getting entangled closely in the String of Pearls strewn by China against India... why does it fail to look 35 years back in history and see how China treated a friend like Vietnam after it's primary objective was done?


What more has to happen for the nations of this one continent to wake up from their slumber and understand that they are sucking their own blood for the vampires that surround them? Why can't we shun these enemies of our nation, our civilization in our pursuit of Truth and Unity? Remember, if we can turn our backs to the weaponry provided by these people, we can effectively end their interference in our and our brother's state.

I would like to end with a beautiful observation made by Iqbal, long back....
Rulaata Hai Tera Nazaara, Ai Hindostaan Mujhko,
Ke Ibrat-Khez Hai, Tera Fasaana Sab Fasaanon Mein

Diya Rona Mujhe Aisa Ke Sab Kucch De Diya Goya,
Likha Kilk-E-Azal Ne Mujhko Tere Nohakhwananon Mein

Nishaan-E-Barq-E-Gul Tak Bhi Naa Chhoda Bagh Mein Gulcheen,
Teri Qismat Se Razm Aaraaean Hai Baghbaanon Mein

Chhipa Kar Asteen Mein Bijliyaan Rakhi Hain Gardon Ne,
Anaadil Baagh Mein Ghhafil Naa Baithe Aashiyaanon Mein

Sun Ai, Ghaafil, Sada Meri, Ye Aisi Cheez Hai Jisko,
Wazifaa Jaankar Padhtey Hain Taair Aastaanon Mein

Watan Ki Fiqr Kar, Naadaan, Qayamat Aanewaali Hai,
Teri Barbaadiyon Ke Mashware Hain Aasmaanon Mein

Zara Dekh Issko, Jo Kucch Ho Raha Hai, Hone Waala Hai,
Dhara Kya Hai Bhala Ahd-E-Kuhan Ke Daastaanon Mein

Ye Khamoshi Kahan Tak, Lazzat-E-Faryaad Paida Kar,
Zameen Par Tu Ho, Aur Teri Sada Ho Aasmaanon Mein

Naa Samjhoge To Mit Jaoge Ai, Hindostaanwaalon,
Tumhaari Daastaan Tak Na Hogi Daastaanon Mein

We did not listen to him the last time .. Will we listen to him this time?

India has been partitioned 9 times ..... how many more partitions do we intend to see before we say, it's enough? The time has come to initiate a fight-back, but do we have the purity of heart, the purpose of mind and the strength of the soul to do so....

This Deepavali, let us arise from our small barriers of race, language, region, religion, caste, creed, colour, community, gender and status and get together with the force of light behind us to mend all that's wrong and to strengthen all that's right.....

Happy Deepavali to all of you.... From a Beast!